top of page
Lanon Wee

Joseph Stiglitz Analyzes Poor Economic Decisions by the Federal Reserve regarding Inflation

In the early stages of 2021, U.S. inflation rapidly increased due to the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic, shooting up to 9.1%, which is the highest it has been in 40 years. At the Ambrosetti Forum, Joseph Stiglitz, an economist, informed CNBC's Steve Sedgwick that the increase in prices was not just the result of too much demand, which the Federal Reserve had initially believed. He clarified that the inflation was also the consequence of shortages in important elements, like semiconductor chips. Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, has asserted that the Federal Reserve failed to take proper action and misjudged the rapid inflation experienced in the U.S. economy in recent years. Since the Covid-19 pandemic began to wane in 2021, annual inflation has increased to a 40-year high of 9.1% by June 2022, yet the Fed only started raising interest rates in March 2022 and Chair Jerome Powell maintained that its effects were "transitory." Stiglitz suggested that the Fed did not adequately research the matter and spoke to CNBC's Steve Sedgwick in the context of the Ambrosetti Forum on Thursday night. Instead, Stiglitz asserted that the price increases were typically due to a scarcity of essential supplies like semiconductors. To combat inflation, the Fed has increased interest rates 11 times up to a range of 5.25%-5.5%, the highest in over two decades.To that end, there has been considerable success, with the yearly consumer price index dropping to 3.2% in July and many signs pointing to a decline in inflationary pressures. Stiglitz suggested that despite the Fed's aggressive monetary policy tightening over the past 18 months, it has not tipped the U.S. economy into recession. He added, however, that the assessment of inflationary dynamics has taught us a valuable lesson. "It's really bad economics," he said, "because [the Fed] saw that the government had passed this enormous recovery program, and if all that money had been spent, it would have been inflationary, but you have to remember back just a few years ago, there was an enormous amount of uncertainty." This uncertainty meant that firms did not invest as much as usual, and consumers held back on spending their accumulated savings from the pandemic, leading to aggregate demand levels that were still lower than pre-pandemic projections. Stiglitz concluded by noting: "Why was there inflation? We all know the reason. Car prices in the beginning went way up — why? Was it because we didn't know how to make cars? No, we knew how to make cars. American auto companies forgot to put in orders for chips, and for want of a chip, you can't make a car." Despite the Fed's accelerated increase of interest rates, the U.S. economy has strangely held up well, though economists remain divided about whether the tighter financial environment could trigger a recession. Stiglitz proposed that the economic soft landing the Fed aimed for might occur due to another auspicious policy "blunder," this time from the federal government in the form of the Inflation Reduction Act. This iconic legislation of the Biden administration, which concentrates on manufacturing, infrastructure and climate change, was launched nearly a year ago to the tune of nearly $500 billion in fresh investments, according to the Treasury. "When the Act was passed, there was the anticipation that some firms would profit from it and it would cost, over 10 years, $271 billion," Stiglitz observed. "At the moment, many sources are predicting its cost to go beyond a trillion dollars. That is a large stimulus to the economy that will counterbalance the restrictive effects of monetary policy, so we may get through this by good fortune. The Fed had no conception of the result of the IRA."

Comments


bottom of page