Those found guilty of distributing or generating explicit images without permission may be subject to incarceration in England and Wales.
Revisions to the Online Safety Bill will impose a six-month prison sentence for disseminating deepfake and revenge porn.
The duration of this would be extended to two years if intent to distress, alarm, or humiliate someone, or to obtain sexual gratification, can be established.
Individuals who distribute an image for the purpose of sexual satisfaction may be included on the registry of sex offenders.
"Revenge porn" entails the unauthorized sharing of an intimate image. "Deepfake porn" involves the creation of a false explicit image or video of an individual.
In 2015, revenge porn was deemed illegal, though before now, prosecutors were obligated to show that the motive was to cause anguish or distress.
Georgia Harrison, an individual who has become known to the public through appearing on television, had her former partner, Stephen Bear, incarcerated earlier in the year for distributing footage of her on his OnlyFans platform without her permission. She was one of the people to express her desire for the laws to be amended.
The Love Island star expressed her gratitude for the support she had been given.
She declared that the changes to the law which have been approved today will be remembered for centuries and bring comfort to numerous individuals who have contacted her, as well as granting future sufferers the justice they need.
The government declared last year that it planned to legislate, and these changes are included in the Online Safety Bill which is expected to be approved by MPs later on this month and will then be enacted.
Alex Chalk, the Justice Secretary, declared: "We are taking firm action against those who use or manipulate intimate photos for the purpose of tormenting and mortifying females and girls."
Our modifications will provide law enforcement and judicial officers with the authority necessary to make these evildoers accountable, protecting females and young ladies from such foul mistreatment.
The usage of deepfakes has been expanding as of late, with one site receiving 38 million visits during the initial eight months of 2021 that enables a virtually bare look at female people.
Results from a study demonstrate that approximately 14% of women and 11% of men aged between 18 and 34 have had to deal with threats to share intimate images.
Between April 2015 and December 2021, police logged over 28,000 incidents of the unauthorized sharing of intimate images.
This update to the legislation regarding intimate images builds upon the adjustments that have been made previously.
The Law Commission conducted an in-depth analysis and proposed changes to safeguard against intimate image abuse.
Nicole Jacobs, the Domestic Abuse Commissioner, enthusiastically welcomed the news and added that the changes would ensure perpetrators of this harrowing form of abuse are held responsible for their actions.
She stated that intimate image abuse inflicts significant mental anguish on victims and survivors, and frequently occurs in the context of prolonged offline mistreatment.
Ruth Davison, the head of Refuge, a charity that works against domestic violence, highlighted the "disappointingly low" conviction rates for intimate image abuse.
She declared that changing the Online Safety Bill would make it simpler to punish those who perpetrate intimate image abuse, guaranteeing survivors would receive justice and greater protections.
Others have indicated that further action should be taken to completely address image-based abuse.
Honza Červenka, a lawyer from McAllister Olivarius, declared the adjustments were appreciated but cautioned of probable "jurisdictional problems".
He informed the BBC that a few of these sites may not be readily traceable, while others may be hosted in countries specially chosen for their leniency regarding online harm and abuse.
Victims routinely discover that images they had previously thought removed reappear months or even years later.
According to Rani Govender, the senior child safety online policy officer at the NSPCC, the current move by big tech companies is a positive one, yet they should be made to be more responsible for what is presented on their platforms.
She argued that further action should be taken if the Online Safety Bill is to successfully address the widespread production and distribution of child sexual abuse material.
The government should take immediate action to plug a gap in the law that would allow tech executives to escape responsibility if they do not confront the role their products play in promoting child sexual abuse.
Comments