YouTube has implemented a verification process for healthcare professionals in Britain in its fight against misinformation distributed on the web.
By 2022, a total of three billion health-related videos had been viewed in the UK through the video-sharing platform.
Since June, medical professionals such as doctors, nurses and psychologists have been submitting applications to the scheme and must satisfy strict criteria determined by the tech corporation in order to qualify.
Successful applicants will be identified by a badge under their name, confirming they are a legitimate, certified healthcare professional.
YouTubers have cautioned that this system is only intended for educational purposes and it should not be an alternative to professional medical advice from a physician.
Vishaal Virani, head of health content for YouTube, stressed the significance of the website due to the huge number of people who obtain healthcare information there.
Despite our feelings, regardless of our wishes, and despite the healthcare industry's efforts, individuals are still obtaining medical knowledge from the web, he told the British Broadcasting Corporation.
We must strive to ensure that the content they absorb when they begin their care journey online is of the highest quality possible.
We strive to establish an atmosphere in which specialists and authorities can raise the quality of the content they produce.
"From my point of view, it's a great opportunity as you can cover some really difficult questions and conversations," Dr Simi Adedeji, a YouTuber concentrating on skin and women's health, expressed.
I'm able to discuss matters that may make women feel uncomfortable, but that are important to talk about in order to ensure their health and well-being."
I'm able to bring up subjects that may make women feel uneasy, but that are essential to address in order to guarantee their good health. These matters can be difficult to broach, even when speaking with a medical professional.
The accessible nature of this content helps to alleviate any potential health-related worries members of the audience may have, as it is created in an easily-digestible and understandable format.
Having been validated on YouTube’s programme, the UK-based doctor attested to the system’s capacity to enable people to evaluate how reliable health videos are.
But she cautioned that her advice and the validation sticker were not at all designed to substitute seeing a doctor.
She commented that providing medical instruction is different than offering medical advice, which is not something they do.”
The goal of this is to provide medical knowledge that will enable the audience to take charge and consult their doctor.
This is highly supplementary; it does not take the place of talking to your physician.
When searching for health topics on YouTube, the top of the search results will display a "health shelf", a list of videos labeled as coming from reliable health sources.
The videos that are included on that list come from sources that YouTube has identified as authoritative and trustworthy.
The tech giant recently took action against false information in videos, particularly concerning health-related topics.
It has been two years since the company declared a complete prohibition on false information concerning vaccinations, ultimately arising from the months of criticism it received for its failure to manage deceptive material concerning the Covid-19 vaccine.
In a study published by the BMJ in 202, it was discovered that 11% of the most watched YouTube videos concerning the vaccine were at odds with the World Health Organisation or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the U.S.
Mr Virani indicated that healthcare workers are authenticated with the help of a "complicated procedure" that draws upon cooperation with the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC) and the NHS, as well as further stakeholders such as the Royal College of Nursing.
Youtubers must possess a valid medical license and cannot have published any videos that include false information in the past.
YouTubers who violate the regulations may find themselves in danger of losing their approval status, or even their entire YouTube account if their infraction is serious.
Alastair Henderson, who used to be the head of the AoMRC, stated the situation might be even worse if confirmed users deliberately give out inaccurate information.
He suggested that their individual professional regulator might be a problem.
We have consulted with regulators regarding the issue of deceitfulness or supplying inaccurate information, which would be contrary to the standards set by the General Medical Council or Nursing Council.
He expressed the wish that other social media companies would follow his example.
I would strongly wish that others will imitate us and I expect that if it is plain that this is lucrative and sought after and YouTube is acknowledged to be of great standard and influential, other people may be keen to do that too... but we are not able to coerce them.
The BBC has inquired of Meta and TikTok to determine if they intend to implement a similar verification process for their respective platforms.
Comentários